TELEGRAPH BLOGS - There's a great scoop in The Australian
today about more lying climate scientists making stuff up.
CLAIMS that some of Australia's leading climate change
scientists were subjected to death threats as part of a vicious and unrelenting
email campaign have been debunked by the Privacy Commissioner.
Timothy Pilgrim was called in to adjudicate on a Freedom of
Information application in relation to Fairfax and ABC reports last June
alleging that Australian National University climate change researchers were
facing the ongoing campaign and had been moved to "more secure
buildings" following explicit threats.
Needless to say the University did everything it could to
prevent the investigation, arguing that the release of the climate scientists'
emails (why am I getting an eerie sense of deja vu here?) "would or could
reasonably be expected to…endanger the life or physical safety of any
person". But doughty Sydney blogger Simon Turnill appealed against this
stonewalling drivel and won. And here's what was revealed when the 11 relevant
emails were eventually released.
Ten of the documents "did not contain threats to kill
or threats of harm."
Of the 11th, the Privacy Commissioner Timothy Pilgrim said:
"I consider the danger to life or physical safety in this case to be only
a possibility, not a real chance."
No wonder the university was so keen to keep things quiet.
Contrary to the claims of the "climate" "scientists" –
widely reported, of course, in the left-wing media – there had been no death
threats whatsoever. Yet their vice-chancellor at the time – now the Australian
government's Chief Scientist – Professor Ian Chubb decided to move them to
"more secure buildings" without, he now admits, having read the
emails to see whether these threats actually existed.
Maybe it's time someone did an FOI to see whether the UEA's
dodgy and discredited Phil Jones really did get any of those "death
threats" he claims to have received after Climategate and which allegedly
drove him to consider suicide. Speaking for myself, if Phil Jones released a
report claiming that grass is green I'd feel compelled to go outside just to
double check. You'll remember that after Climategate, the University of Easy
Access's main concern was not so much to investigate any potential malfeasance
by its Climatic Research Unit gang of FOI-breaching, data-fudging,
scientific-method-abusing, grant-troughing second-raters as to put the right
spin on them. That tame "woe is me" interview Jones gave to a
compliant Sunday Times was part of a strategy arranged by the public relations
company UEA had employed – no doubt at lavish taxpayer expense – to make the
disgraced Jones and his department look more sinned against than sinning.
I've a strong suspicion that the emails I get in my inbox
most days from the ecoloons who congregate at places like the Guardian's
Komment Macht Frei are far more foul-mouthed, repellant and poisonous than
anything these junk scientists have ever received. The difference is, I do my
damnedest to stick to the truth and I'm not being paid zillions of pounds or
dollars at public expense to promote the most expensive and mendacious scam in the
history of science. There's just no justice is there?
view site: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100155441/lying-climate-scientists-lie-again-about-death-threats-this-time/
No comments:
Post a Comment